Category Archives: Perspectives

History, belief systems and more

Why not Bamboo

Why not Bamboo

Bamboo is a very environmentally friendly, renewable, plentiful and fast-growing material. It has the potential to replace plastics and other non-environmentally friendly materials. Consider the following.

1. BAMBOO GROWS FAST – LIKE REALLY FAST

According to Guinness World Records, some species of bamboo can grow up to 2.91 ft/day — or, 1.5 inches/hr! So if you sit long enough with a bamboo culm, it might just grow before your eyes!

This is where bamboo differs from most other flora, which put their energy into continued growth of the original stem. Once bamboo is established (usually after 3 years), the new shoots that emerge each spring will continue to get bigger and bigger. Pretty cool, right?

2. BAMBOO HAS REGENERATION SUPERPOWERS

No, really! Cutting bamboo actually stimulates growth. How does this work? Well, rather than directing energy towards regaining its lost height, a cut bamboo stalk will simply unfurl new leaves.

These leaves, in turn, create and send energy down to the root system to encourage the growth of new shoots. The more that gets harvested, the faster it grows. That makes bamboo an incredible renewable resource that can be harvested and will regrow naturally.

3. BAMBOO CAN SEQUESTER A LOT OF CARBON

Bamboo’s incredible growth rate is impressive, and some of the reasons are less obvious — including its powerful carbon sequestration potential. When properly managed and intensively harvested, bamboo can sequester up to 1.78 tonnes of CO2 per clump per year. This translates into a CO2 drawdown curve that’s up to 10X faster than that of woody trees. That’s HUGE! 

4. BAMBOO FILTERS AND SLOWS THE FLOW OF WATER

Dense bamboo roots form a water barrier, and are used by coastal villages to protect their crops from getting washed out by rising water tables. And thanks to this barrier, bamboo can effectively filter organic matter (including soil nitrogen), leading some scientists to explore it as a sustainable wastewater treatment option.

5. BAMBOO IS VIRTUALLY FIRE-PROOF

Because it contains large amounts of silicate acid, bamboo is abnormally flame resistant. This is good news in fire-prone regions of the world, where other tree and grass species are regularly devastated by wildfires. Incorporating clumping bamboo into tropical reforestation efforts, then, can protect the long-term viability of projects.

6. BAMBOO IS REALLY STRONG AND FLEXIBLE

Which makes it an incredible, environmentally friendly building material — especially in earthquake-prone regions. In this regard, bamboo has been prevalent since the beginning of humanity, and has been used in place of wood, bricks, steel, and more. In fact, in some countries, bamboo stalks are used to build scaffolding. If we used bamboo for more construction purposes, we would save many trees and primary forests from deforestation.

7. BAMBOO HELPS TO HOLD THE SOIL TOGETHER

Because bamboo is a grass, it has a very shallow root system — with rhizomes only populating the top 6 inches of the soil. The rest of the roots only spread around 14 inches deeper. But because the roots are so densely clumped, they do a great job at holding the top layer of the soil together, thus preventing soil erosion.

On a recent International flight we were provided disposable bamboo utensils for our meals. I decided to take a couple of sets home and have used one set more than a dozen times. They are much sturdier than plastic.

So, my question is when will more entrepreneurs take this on? It seems to have tremendous potential.

Astronaut shares the profound ‘big lie’

Astronaut shares the profound ‘big lie’ he realized after seeing the Earth from space

This change in perspective could change humanity. A great article and so true.

Our home, from space.

Sixty-one years ago, Yuri Gagarin became the first human to make it into space and probably the first to experience what scientists now call the “overview effect.” This change occurs when people see the world from far above and notice that it’s a place where “borders are invisible, where racial, religious and economic strife are nowhere to be seen.”

The overview effect makes man’s squabbles with one another seem incredibly petty and presents the planet as it truly is, one interconnected organism.

In a compelling interview with Big Think, astronaut, author, and humanitarian Ron Garan explains how if more of us developed this planetary perspective we could fix much of what ails humanity and the planet.

Garan has spent 178 days in space and traveled more than 71 million miles in 2,842 orbits. From high above, he realized that the planet is a lot more fragile than he thought.

“When I looked out the window of the International Space Station, I saw the paparazzi-like flashes of lightning storms, I saw dancing curtains of auroras that seemed so close it was as if we could reach out and touch them. And I saw the unbelievable thinness of our planet’s atmosphere. In that moment, I was hit with the sobering realization that that paper-thin layer keeps every living thing on our planet alive,” Garan said in the video.

“I saw an iridescent biosphere teeming with life,” he continues. “I didn’t see the economy. But since our human-made systems treat everything, including the very life-support systems of our planet, as the wholly owned subsidiary of the global economy, it’s obvious from the vantage point of space that we’re living a lie.”

It was at that moment he realized that humanity needs to reevaluate its priorities.

“We need to move from thinking economy, society, planet to planet, society, economy. That’s when we’re going to continue our evolutionary process,” he added.

Garan says that we are paying a very “high price” as a civilization for our inability to develop a more planetary perspective and that it’s a big reason why we’re failing to solve many of our problems. Even though our economic activity may improve quality of life on one end, it’s also disasterous for the planet that sustains our lives.

It’s like cutting off our nose to spite our face.

Actor William Shatner had a similar experience to Garan’s when he traveled into space.

“It was among the strongest feelings of grief I have ever encountered,” Shatner wrote. “The contrast between the vicious coldness of space and the warm nurturing of Earth below filled me with overwhelming sadness. Every day, we are confronted with the knowledge of further destruction of Earth at our hands: the extinction of animal species, of flora and fauna … things that took five billion years to evolve, and suddenly we will never see them again because of the interference of mankind.”

“We’re not going to have peace on Earth until we recognize the basic fact of the interrelated structure of all reality,” Garan said.

However dire the situation looks from the surface of Earth, the astronaut has hope that we can collectively evolve in consciousness and wake up and embrace a larger reality. “And when we can evolve beyond a two-dimensional us versus them mindset, and embrace the true multi-dimensional reality of the universe that we live in, that’s when we’re going to no longer be floating in darkness … and it’s a future that we would all want to be a part of. That’s our true calling.”

This article originally appeared on 12.16.22

Close Presidential Elections

Close Presidential Elections

How close was the last Presidential Election? What many people do not realize is that it was only the 13th closest (12 prior elections were closer).

RankYearWinnerNumber of electors votingNormalized victory marginPercentage
totalwinnerrunner-up
   (c)(w)(r)  
591824John Quincy Adams2619984Decided by House vote37.93%
581876Rutherford B. Hayes3691851840.00350.14%
572000George W. Bush5372712660.00950.47%
561796John Adams138[b]71680.02951.45%
551916Woodrow Wilson5312772540.04352.17%
541800Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr (tie)1387365Decided  by House vote52.90%
532004George W. Bush5382862510.06353.16%
521884Grover Cleveland4012191820.09254.61%
511976Jimmy Carter5382972400.10455.20%
501968Richard Nixon5383011910.11955.95%
491848Zachary Taylor2901631270.12456.21%
481960John F. Kennedy5373032190.12856.42%
472016Donald Trump[d]5383042270.1356.51%

An interesting fact is that four elections were not decided by popular vote but (as by law) by the electoral college. All four were won by Republicans. About 38% of all registered voters are Democrats, 29% are Republicans and 33% are either “Other” or Independents.

The Electoral College gives an advantage to smaller states since the formula allows each three electoral votes regardless of population. The following chart:

HouseElectoral
RankStatePopulationSeatsVotesRedBlue
152Wyoming            581,381133
251  Vermont647,0641                   3          3
350  District of Columbia671,8031*                   3          3
449  Alaska733,5831                   3         3
548  North Dakota779,2611                   3         3
647  South Dakota909,8241                   3         3
746  Delaware1,018,3961                   3          3
845  Rhode Island1,093,7342                   4          4
944  Montana1,122,8672                   4         4
1043  Maine1,385,3402                   4purplepurple
1142  New Hampshire1,395,2312                   4purplepurple
1241  Hawaii1,440,1962                   4          4
1340  West Virginia1,775,1562                   4         4
1439  Idaho1,939,0332                   4         4
1538  Nebraska1,967,9233                   5         5
1637  New Mexico2,113,3443                   5          5
1736  Kansas2,937,1504                   6         6
1835  Mississippi2,940,0574                   6         6
1934  Arkansas3,045,6374                   6         6
2033  Nevada3,177,7724                   6          6
2132  Iowa3,200,5174                   6         6
2230  Utah3,380,8004                   6         6
37,674,688955928
Total US331,449,281          538
% of Total11.4%17.7%

11.4% of the population has 17.7% of the votes.

The electoral provides an advantage to Republicans. My question is how well represented are the 1/3 of the registered voters that are not either Democrat or Republican? I have often heard the quip “If you don’t vote for either of the major parties you are throwing your vote away”.