Olympics Observations

Olympics Observations

As I mentioned in an earlier post I watched quite a bit of Olympic TV coverage during my two weeks in Mumbai. I have always been a fan of the Olympics. I was living in Canada in 1960 when the first miracle on ice occurred for the USA hockey team, and who could forget the 1980 version? As a fan and citizen of the USA, I have always rooted for my country’s team. Watching the 2026 event it occurred to me that I was also rooting for other countries. Having lived in Canada in my youth, I found myself rooting for their athletes, and since I am also a permanent resident of my adopted country,y New Zealand, of course, they have my support. Surprisingly, I found myself rooting for Norway, a country with 5.5 million residents (about the same size as New Zealand). Not only are they leading in both Gold & all the medal counts, but what is even more impressive is when you consider both counts on a per capita basis. It’s incredible. I’ll leave the math to you.

One other observation that occurs to me is that most of those athletes are attractive far beyond the norm. Since they are dedicated and hard working to even be participating, you would expect most to be physically fit, no surprise there. However, why do so many have attractive facial features? And among them, many would be considered very attractive. Does their attractiveness influence their self-image,e leading to assertiveness? Just a bit of speculation on my part.

How do healthcare prices and utilization in the United States compare

How do healthcare prices and utilization in the United States compare to those in peer nations?

By Delaney Tevis, Matt McGoughJuliette CubanskiMatthew Rae Twitter, and Cynthia Cox   KFF

September 4, 2025

The United States spends more on healthcare than any other large, wealthy country. Total health spending is largely a product of two factors: 1) prices of healthcare services and 2) the volume of services and medications used. This chart collection compares indicators of health care utilization and prices in the United States and 11 similarly wealthy countries to investigate whether higher prices or higher utilization of healthcare services drives the high healthcare expenditures in the U.S. relative to peer nations. 

International comparisons of healthcare systems are complex. Differences in patient populations, healthcare financing systems, and public health infrastructure can make direct comparisons difficult. Within these limitations, care was taken to identify data sources that provide as robust comparisons as possible.  

According to the most updated internationally comparable data available, the U.S. has higher prices—particularly among private health plans—for many healthcare services. Meanwhile, utilization of many services, including doctor’s visits, number and length of hospital stays, and a variety of inpatient surgeries, is lower than in many comparable countries. As a result, the evidence continues to support the finding that higher prices – as opposed to higher utilization – explain the United States’ high health spending relative to other high-income countries. Data used to identify Medicare costs in the United States exclude physician fees, which vary widely by service and facility type, accounting for roughly 5-10% of the cost for inpatient hospital services, a 10–20% share for outpatient imaging and diagnostic services, and up to 50% for certain hospital outpatient department visits. As a result, international price comparisons may understate the actual gap between U.S. and peer country prices. 

While additional factors like administrative overhead and intensity of care delivered may also impact differences in total health expenditures between countries, the fundamental pattern of the U.S. having higher prices for healthcare services and using less care on average has persisted for many years.  

The U.S. spends nearly twice as much on healthcare per person as the average of peer nations

In 2023, the U.S. spent $13,432 per person on healthcare, which is 1.8 times the average amount spent in comparable countries ($7,393 per person). Spending on healthcare accounted for 16.7% of the U.S.’s GDP in 2023, compared to an average of 11.0% in comparable countries. The next highest-spending country (Switzerland) devoted 12.0% of its GDP to healthcare. Historical data shows that the U.S. has long spent a higher share of its GDP on healthcare than comparable countries, with the gap widening over the last five decades.

Sooooo we must have the best quality of healthcare, right?

The top 20 countries with the best healthcare are:

  1. Taiwan (78.72)
  2. South Korea (77.7)
  3. Australia (74.11)
  4. Canada (71.32)
  5. Sweden (70.73)
  6. Ireland (67.99)
  7. Netherlands (65.38)
  8. Germany (64.66)
  9. Norway (64.63)
  10. Israel (61.73)
  11. Belgium (60.16)
  12. Switzerland (59.6)
  13. Japan (59.52)
  14. Singapore (57.96)
  15. United States (56.71)
  16. Austria (54.86)
  17. United Arab Emirates (52.3)
  18. Czech Republic (52.25)
  19. Finland (52.1)
  20. Portugal (51.99)

UFO Disabled Nuclear Missile with Laser Beams

A ‘disc-shaped UFO’ disabled a US nuclear missile over the Pacific during a routine test, according to multiple military whistleblowers.

The craft allegedly circled the unarmed dummy warhead as it travelled at several thousand miles per hour, before firing four beams of light at the missile.

It is not known at what altitude the altercation is said to have occurred.

Retired US Air Force officers Lieutenant Bob Jacobs and Major Florenze Mansmann are among the two who claim the event took place, and say they have seen footage of the event, which was captured on September 15, 1964.

However, the video has since gone missing.

Extraordinary allegations about the encounter have been swirling for years, but are now being investigated by author Robert Hastings, whose books include UFOs and Nukes: The Secret Link Revealed.

Lt Jacobs and Maj Mansmann were part of the team charged with filming the test from a military telescopic photography site in Big Sur, California, and while doing so, inadvertently captured the altercation.

They allege that after a ‘highly-restricted’ screening of the footage, two plain-clothed CIA officers confiscated the tape.

Lt Jacobs said that at the time Maj Mansmann had told him ‘To not to talk about it’, and said ‘it had never happened’.