The White Elephant in the Room

The White Elephant in the Room

I know many folks think that Trump is our biggest problem. While there are many issues created by him, and he is extremely dangerous, he is far from the world’s most severe problem. His scourge is short-term, and despite his devastating impact, it is short term and soon the USA will recover. The overriding issue is sustainability, and in that regard we are in severe trouble.

Immigration is down, population is aging, the internal population is declining & the workforce is declining. Check the debt clock (https://www.usdebtclock.org/#) for the workforce 2026 vs 2000. Immigration is essential to maintaining both our workforce and a “sort of” balanced budget so that there are enough workers to fund programs for the elderly. The following are some related links,

The Demographic Squeeze: Why Labor Force Participation is Projected to Fall Through 2034 – Indeed Hiring Lab

urban.org/policy-centers/cross-center-initiatives/program-retirement-policy/projects/data-warehouse/what-future-holds/us-population-aging

U.S. Population Growth Slows Due to Historic Decline in Net International Migration

New Population Estimates Show Historic Decline in Net International Migration

Earth is already far over capacity, population study finds

Josie Fischels

Updated: Jul 19, 2026 / 09:59 AM CDT

(NewsNation) — Earth has been carrying more people than it can sustainably support for decades, according to a new study that analyzed more than 200 years of population and environmental data.

The research was led by ecologist Corey Bradshaw of Flinders University in Australia.

Researchers tracked how the rate of global population growth changed alongside population size dating back to 1800.

The super El Niño is getting more super 

They found that, until the 1950s, population growth spurred more innovation, greater energy use, and faster economic expansion.

By the early 1960s, the population continued to grow, but the growth rate began to slow. Even so, the slowdown did not prevent humanity’s overall impact on the planet from increasing.

Earth’s ‘carrying capacity’ naturally is around 2.5 billion

Ecologists use the term “carrying capacity” to describe the number of individuals an environment can support over the long term without exhausting its resources.

The study examined both Earth’s maximum capacity, regardless of quality of life, and a more sustainable figure that assumes people maintain a reasonable standard of living.

According to the study, Earth can sustainably support about 2.5 billion people, roughly the size of the global population in the mid-20th century. The current population is about 8.3 billion, more than three times that figure.

The study estimates the absolute upper limit, if current trends continue, could reach between 11.7 billion and 12.4 billion people sometime between the late 2060s and 2070s.

Fossil fuels and infrastructure have expanded limits — for now

Researchers say cheap, abundant energy has enabled humanity to produce more food, build more infrastructure and support more people than natural resources alone would allow.

However, they argue this has merely delayed the consequences.

Climate change, pollution and growing pressure on food and water systems are all signs the gap is narrowing.

While population size helps explain trends in rising global temperatures, carbon emissions and ecological damage, researchers say consumption patterns are also pushing the planet beyond its limits.

Slower population growth, lower consumption key to avoiding collapse: Researchers Bradshaw and his co-authors argue the world needs to rethink how it uses land, water, energy and other resources. They say slower population growth and reduced consumption are

Amazing & Unexplained

Amazing & Unexplained

The main regret about our trip to Egypt was that we were not able to visit the Serapeum of Saqqara.  While the sarcophagi have been referred to as bull coffins, there is no substantial evidence that this is true. The true purpose is unexplained, as is the method of construction and placement.

The burial site is the Serapeum of Saqqara, located northwest of the Step Pyramid of Djoser, near Memphis. It was used from the New Kingdom (starting under Amenhotep III) through the Ptolemaic Period, and was closed around 30 BC Wikipedia+1. The complex evolved from isolated tombs into vast underground galleries lined with 24–25 sarcophagi Egypt Tours Portal.

The sarcophagi are made from extremely hard stones like granite and diorite, quarried from distant sites (up to 800 km away) The Ancient Code. Weights range from about 40 to 100 tons, with lids of around 25–30 tons. The Serapeum was rediscovered in 1850 by French Egyptologist Auguste Mariette. Serapeum of Saqqara

The main corridor measures roughly 300 meters in length, and there are 24 granite sarcophagi in total, each placed inside its own side chamber.

Coming to America

Coming to America

My high school history class spent a bit of time explaining how folks got to the Americas. Keep in mind that this was about 65 years ago. We learned about Columbus in 1492 and the slight possibility that Eric the Red’s son Leif Erikson might have made it via Greenland much earlier. We learned that the West Coast was discovered by immigrants from Asia traveling across the ice bridge from Russia to Alaska and then migrating Southward.

Over time, history changed. “Leif Erikson, a Norse explorer born around 970 CE, sailed from Greenland to North America after being blown off course on a voyage from Norway around 1000 CE, according to the Icelandic sagas. He landed in a region he called Vinland, noted for its forests, grapes, and mild climate, and established a small settlement known as Leifsbudir. This area is generally associated with the northern tip of Newfoundland, Canada, where the archaeological site L’Anse aux Meadows was later discovered and dated to approximately 1021 CE.
The sagas describe that Leif’s voyage was inspired by earlier reports from Bjarni Herjólfsson, who had sighted lands west of Greenland around 986 CE but did not land. Leif’s expedition included a crew of about 35 men, and after wintering in Vinland, he returned to Greenland with timber and grapes, earning the nickname “Leif the Lucky”. While Leif himself did not return to Vinland, subsequent Norse explorers, including his siblings and other Icelanders, continued to explore. Leif Erikson’s discovery of North America is dated to around 1000 CE, making him the first known European to set foot on the continent, centuries before Columbus’s voyage in 1492. While the sagas had been considered historically unreliable, we now believe at least some of them to have been accurate.

What will we discover that changes history in the future? “Archaeological evidence shows that indigenous peoples had inhabited parts of North America for thousands of years. For example, human habitation in Newfoundland dates back at least 9,000 years, with earlier Maritime Archaic cultures appearing about 5,000 years ago.” Currently, it is assumed that this evidence is a result of Asian migration, where people migrated from West to East.  Is it possible that during the Ice Age people from Europe were able to travel by land or along the coastline to reach the Americas? It’s possible, but there is no evidence so far.

On the other coast the assumption from my history class days was that the migration probably was initiated 12 to 15,000 years ago based on the oldest archaeological sites that had been discovered at that time. More recent research, however, suggests a human presence dating to between 18,000 and 26,000 years ago, during the Last Glacial Maximum. Not the least of which is Monte Verde, a Paleolithic archaeological site in the Llanquihue Province in southern Chile, located near Puerto Montt, Los Lagos Region. The site is primarily known for Monte Verde II, generally suggested to date to 14,500 years ago, which has been largely accepted (though not without dissent) as showing that the human settlement of the Americas predates the Clovis culture by at least 1,000 years, contrary to the now discredited “Clovis first” paradigm. The site also contains an older, much more controversial layer (Monte Verde I) suggested to date to 18,500 cal BP (16,500 BC), which lacks the general acceptance of Monte Verde.

Some of the oldest sites in North America https://letstalkgeography.com/web-stories/7-of-the-oldest-archaeological-sites-in-north-america/